From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Ellis

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Mar 5, 2007
CASE NO.: 3:06cv362/LAC/MD (N.D. Fla. Mar. 5, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:06cv362/LAC/MD.

March 5, 2007


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated February 23, 2007. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and the objections thereto, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for plaintiff's failure to state a claim, and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Ellis

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Mar 5, 2007
CASE NO.: 3:06cv362/LAC/MD (N.D. Fla. Mar. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Thomas v. Ellis

Case Details

Full title:RONALD C. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN ELLIS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Mar 5, 2007

Citations

CASE NO.: 3:06cv362/LAC/MD (N.D. Fla. Mar. 5, 2007)

Citing Cases

Shinholster v. Rich

Indeed, It may be that a few smacks of a handcuffed inmate to "keep him in line" is constitutionally…