From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Dunn

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 3, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv453-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 3, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv453-MHT (WO)

08-03-2015

DANIEL K. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERSON DUNN, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction be denied. Also before the court is the plaintiff's objection to the recommendation. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The objection to the recommendation (doc. no. 20) is overruled.

2. The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 15) is adopted.

3. The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 3) is denied.

It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

DONE, this the 3rd day of August, 2015.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Dunn

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 3, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv453-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Thomas v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL K. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERSON DUNN, et al., Defendants.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 3, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv453-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 3, 2015)

Citing Cases

Price v. Dunn

Buckley v. Precythe, ___S.Ct.___, 2019 WL 1428884, *14 (Apr. 1, 2019). And as explained in Thomas v. Dunn,…

Bush v. Scott

Nor is DSP constitutionally required to provide Plaintiff with a notary. See Thomas v. Dunn, No.…