From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Dovey

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 13, 2022
1:19-cv-00333-JLT-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)

Opinion

1:19-cv-00333-JLT-SAB (PC)

10-13-2022

MICHAEL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. DAVID DOVEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER APPROVING PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO OFFER OF JUDGMENT (ECF No. 88)

Plaintiff Michael Thomas is proceeding forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On October 12, 2022, the parties filed a joint stipulation to extend the time to respond to the offer ofjudgment. (ECF No. 88.)

On the basis of good cause, the parties joint stipulation is approved and the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' offer of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 is extended from fourteen (14) days to twenty-eight (28) days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Dovey

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 13, 2022
1:19-cv-00333-JLT-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Thomas v. Dovey

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. DAVID DOVEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 13, 2022

Citations

1:19-cv-00333-JLT-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2022)