From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Darling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2017
No. 2:16-cv-2691 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2:16-cv-2691 JAM CKD P

05-03-2017

JAMAAL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. CHAD DARLING, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 28, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 28, 2017, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant Jorden is dismissed from this action with prejudice. Dated: May 3, 2017

/s/ JOHN A. MENDEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 / thom2691.800


Summaries of

Thomas v. Darling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2017
No. 2:16-cv-2691 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Thomas v. Darling

Case Details

Full title:JAMAAL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. CHAD DARLING, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 3, 2017

Citations

No. 2:16-cv-2691 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2017)