From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Daniel

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 23, 2012
NO. 02-12-00107-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2012)

Summary

dismissing Thomas's appeal at his behest

Summary of this case from Thomas v. Daniel

Opinion

NO. 02-12-00107-CV

08-23-2012

FABIAN THOMAS APPELLANT v. DENISE DANIEL APPELLEE


FROM THE 431ST DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant's "Motion To Dismiss." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Daniel

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 23, 2012
NO. 02-12-00107-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2012)

dismissing Thomas's appeal at his behest

Summary of this case from Thomas v. Daniel
Case details for

Thomas v. Daniel

Case Details

Full title:FABIAN THOMAS APPELLANT v. DENISE DANIEL APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Aug 23, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-12-00107-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Daniel

We dismissed Thomas's appeal regarding the property division issues on August 23, 2012, after he moved to…

Thomas v. Daniel

(mem. op.) (rejecting Thomas's arguments concerning attorney's fees and the use of unsworn testimony); Thomas…