From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Conforti

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 30, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-1960 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-1960.

March 30, 2006


ORDER


The above captioned case commenced with the filing of a petition to proceed in forma pauperis on December 30, 2004, and the matter was referred to United States Magistrate Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The complaint was filed on February 11, 2005.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 40), filed on March 7, 2006, recommended that the Motions to Dismiss filed by defendants (Doc. Nos. 17, 19 and 25) be granted. The report and recommendation was served on the Plaintiff at SCI Forest, P.O. Box 945, Marienville, PA 16239, and on counsel for the Defendants. The parties were advised they were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file written objections to the report and recommendation. No objections have been filed. After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss filed by defendants (Doc. Nos. 17, 19 and 25) are GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 40) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated March 7, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Conforti

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 30, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-1960 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Thomas v. Conforti

Case Details

Full title:CURT THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. DR. WILLIAM CONFORTI; DR. PAUL NOEL; DR…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 30, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-1960 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2006)