From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 13, 2014
Case No. 13-10579 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 13, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 13-10579

03-13-2014

DAVID WAYNE THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Honorable Patrick J. Duggan


Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk


OPINION AND ORDER

On February 11, 2013, Plaintiff David Wayne Thomas filed this lawsuit challenging a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's application for social security disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Two days later, on February 13, 2013, this Court referred the lawsuit to Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk for all pretrial matters proceedings, including a hearing and determination of all non-dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and/or a report and recommendation ("R&R") on all dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (ECF No. 2.) The parties subsequently filed cross-motions for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 8, 12.) On February 17, 2014, Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk issued an R&R recommending that this Court grant Defendant's motion and deny Plaintiff's motion. (ECF No. 15.)

In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk thoroughly analyzes the arguments set forth by both parties in their respective motions for summary judgment and ultimately concludes that there was substantial evidence in the record to support the Administrative Law Judge's determination that Plaintiff was not under a "disability" as that term is used in the Social Security Act. (R&R 23, 30-32.) At the conclusion of the R&R, Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk advises the parties that they may object to and seek review of the R&R within fourteen days of service upon them. (Id. at 32.) He further specifically advises the parties that "[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right to appeal." (Id. at 32-33.) Neither party filed objections to the R&R.

The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions reached by Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk. The Court therefore adopts Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk's February 17, 2014 Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: Richard J. Doud, Esq.
Alison Schwartz, Esq.
Allen Duarte, Esq.
Derri T. Thomas, AUSA
Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk


Summaries of

Thomas v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 13, 2014
Case No. 13-10579 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Thomas v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WAYNE THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 13, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13-10579 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 13, 2014)

Citing Cases

Zack v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Second, although plaintiff mentions the treating physician rule in the body of her initial brief, no specific…