From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2020
CASE NO. CV 19-00167-DMG (SK) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 19-00167-DMG (SK)

01-06-2020

ERNEST PEACHY THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART COUNTY'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed all relevant records in this case and the attached Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The time for objections has passed with none filed. The Court thus concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge.

THEREFORE, the County's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set forth in the Report and Recommendation. The County and Defendant J. Estrada must file their answers to the surviving claims in the complaint, as described in the Report and Recommendation, within 14 days of this order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A). The case remains referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 6, 2020

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Thomas v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2020
CASE NO. CV 19-00167-DMG (SK) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Thomas v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST PEACHY THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 6, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. CV 19-00167-DMG (SK) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2020)