From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Charlotte

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 26, 2007
231 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-2281.

Submitted: June 21, 2007.

Decided: June 26, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00238).

Alfred T. Thomas, Randy L. Thomas, Appellants Pro Se. Mark Weston Johnson, Helms, Mulliss Wicker, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Alfred T. Thomas and Randy L. Thomas appeal the district court's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss and dismissing the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ, No. 3:06-cv-00238, 2006 WL 3257051 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2006). We deny Thomas' motions to certify and for sanctions, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Charlotte

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 26, 2007
231 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Thomas v. Charlotte

Case Details

Full title:Alfred T. THOMAS; Randy L. Thomas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHARLOTTE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 26, 2007

Citations

231 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Bethea v. Army Nat'l Guard Army Dep't of Def. the Citadel

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant, North Carolina National Guard's, Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No.…

Bethea v. Army Nat'l Guard Army Dep't of Def. the Citadel

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant, the Citadel's, Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10) and Memorandum…