From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Carrasco

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 17, 2006
No. 1:04-cv-05793-OWW-LJO-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. 1:04-cv-05793-OWW-LJO-P.

February 17, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 8) ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION


Plaintiff, Josh Thomas ("plaintiff"), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On November 22, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On December 19, 2005, plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 22, 2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Carrasco

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 17, 2006
No. 1:04-cv-05793-OWW-LJO-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Thomas v. Carrasco

Case Details

Full title:JOSH THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAVID CARRASCO, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 17, 2006

Citations

No. 1:04-cv-05793-OWW-LJO-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2006)