Thomas v. Capano Homes Inc.

5 Citing cases

  1. Petroleum v. Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P.

    C.A. No. N12C-02-302 FWW (Del. Super. Ct. Jun. 23, 2015)   Cited 8 times
    Declining to enforce a limitations of damages clause at the summary judgment stage because the analysis requires an examination of the "particular facts of the parties' conduct"

    Id. (quoting Coleman v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLC, 854 A.2d 838, 842 (Del. 2004)). In Thomas v. Capano Homes Inc., 2015 WL 1593618, the Court recently denied a Motion to Dismiss where the parties disagreed as to when the statute of limitations began to accrue. The Court held that

  2. Del. Human & Civil Rights Comm'n v. Schell Bros.

    C. A. S23C-04-004 MHC (Del. Super. Ct. Oct. 13, 2023)   Cited 1 times
    Denying motion to dismiss in situation where complaint filed by special counsel nine months after charge and two months after DOJ determined that it had a conflict

    Gray's Landing Dev., LLC v. Blackston Cove Dev., LLC, 2023 WL 2609633, at *2 (Del. Super. Mar. 21, 2023). Thomas v. Capano Homes Inc., 2015 WL 1593618, at *2 (Del. Super. Apr. 2, 2015). Id.

  3. Banner v. Hockessin Chase, L.P.

    C. A. N21C-06-235 JRJ (Del. Super. Ct. May. 12, 2022)   Cited 1 times

    Reid v. Thompson Homes at Centerville, Inc., 2007 WL 4248478, at *4 (Del. Super. Ct. Nov. 21, 2007) (quoting AT&T Corp. v. Clarendon America Ins., 2006 WL 2685081, at *3 (Del. Super. Ct. Sept. 18, 2006)). Super. Ct. Civ. R. 12(b)(6); Thomas v. Capano Homes Inc., 2015 WL 1593618, at *2 (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 2, 2015) (citing Clinton v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 977 A.2d 892, 895 (Del. 2009)).

  4. Envolve Pharmacy Sols. v. Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.

    C.A. No. N19C-12-214 PRW CCLD (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 15, 2021)   Cited 4 times
    Ruling courts should not apply the voluntary payment doctrine to fraud, misrepresentations, or mistakes of fact

    In re Nine Systems Corp. Shareholder Litig., 2013 WL 4013306, at *11 (Del. Ch. Jul. 31, 2013). See Thomas v. Capano Homes Inc., 2015 WL 1593618, at *2 (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 2, 2015) (calling an evaluation of inquiry notice "premature" at the motion to dismiss stage). In short, all of these arguments by Rite Aid require specific facts not yet available and inquiries never engaged under Rule 12(b)(6).

  5. Donald M. Durkin Contracting, Inc. v. City of Newark

    C.A. No. N19C-09-206 DCS (Del. Super. Ct. Jun. 4, 2020)   Cited 3 times

    However, under Delaware Superior Court Rule 12(b)(6), the Court will dismiss a complaint "if it appears with reasonable certainty that, under any set of facts that could be proven to support the claims asserted, the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief."Thomas v. Capano Homes Inc., 2015 WL 1593618, at *2 (Del. Super. Apr. 2, 2015). Id.