From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Beutler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 7, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-1300 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1300 MCE CKD P

08-07-2012

EDWARD THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. M. BEUTLER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. (See Dkt. No. 49.) The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 49) is denied.

_________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Beutler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 7, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-1300 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Thomas v. Beutler

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. M. BEUTLER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 7, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1300 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2012)