From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 24, 2012
CIVIL NO. 2:11-1649 CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:11-1649 CKD

01-24-2012

JASON L. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

(authorized via telephone) ANDREW T. KOENIG Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION

The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from January 23, 2012 to February 22, 2012. This extension is needed to allow Defendant additional time to review the defensibility of the administrative law judge's decision. Defendant apologizes for the delay and any inconvenience.

All other dates in the Courts Scheduling Order are extended accordingly.

Respectfully submitted,

(authorized via telephone)

ANDREW T. KOENIG

Attorney for Plaintiff

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED:

____________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 24, 2012
CIVIL NO. 2:11-1649 CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Thomas v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JASON L. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 24, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:11-1649 CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2012)