From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 25, 2008
Civ. No. 07-3313 (PJS/RLE) (D. Minn. Jul. 25, 2008)

Summary

finding that a similar hypothetical was correctly formulated for a vocational expert

Summary of this case from Edwards v. Colvin

Opinion

Civ. No. 07-3313 (PJS/RLE).

July 25, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled matter, IT IS ORDERED:

1. That the Plaintiff's Motion [Docket No. 10] for Summary Judgment is denied.
2. That the Defendant's Motion [Docket No. 17] for Summary Judgment is granted.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 25, 2008
Civ. No. 07-3313 (PJS/RLE) (D. Minn. Jul. 25, 2008)

finding that a similar hypothetical was correctly formulated for a vocational expert

Summary of this case from Edwards v. Colvin
Case details for

Thomas v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Donald A. Thomas, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jul 25, 2008

Citations

Civ. No. 07-3313 (PJS/RLE) (D. Minn. Jul. 25, 2008)

Citing Cases

Edwards v. Colvin

The authority that Mr. Edwards cites supports the conclusion that the ALJ properly constructed the…