From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 6, 2006
1:06-cv-00099-OWW-DLB-HC, Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 12) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2006)

Opinion

1:06-cv-00099-OWW-DLB-HC, Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 12).

August 6, 2006


ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER JUDGMENT


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 12, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. To date, the parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 12, 2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED, without prejudice; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 6, 2006
1:06-cv-00099-OWW-DLB-HC, Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 12) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2006)
Case details for

Thomas v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN LINDSEY THOMAS, Petitioner, v. DARRYL ADAMS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 6, 2006

Citations

1:06-cv-00099-OWW-DLB-HC, Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 12) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2006)