From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Abayomi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Sep 10, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-624 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 10, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-624

09-10-2020

WILLIE JAVON THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. SAM ABAYOMI, ET AL, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Willie Javon Thomas, an inmate confined at the Stiles Unit in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Sam Abayomi and Latroya Bell.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends the defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted with respect to plaintiff's claims against her based on her position as a supervisor. However, the Magistrate Judge recommends the defendant's motion be denied with respect to plaintiff's claims of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. Defendant Bell filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes the defendant's objections are without merit.

The defendant objects that the Magistrate Judge considered plaintiff's untimely response to the motion for summary judgment; however, the court has discretion to consider plaintiff's response. Further, genuine issues of material fact exist preventing summary judgment regarding the defendant's alleged deliberate indifference to plaintiff's serious medical needs. Plaintiff alleges he suffered extreme pain and discomfort from the injury to his head for approximately eight hours before being prescribed acetaminophen which reduced "some of the excruciating pain and inflamation." As there are genuine issues of material fact as to the defendant's knowledge of plaintiff's injuries and awareness of the severity of his injuries, summary judgment is not appropriate.

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. It is

ORDERED that defendant Bell's motion for summary judgement is GRANTED as to any claim against her in her capacity as a supervisor. It is further

ORDERED that defendant Bell's motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to plaintiff's claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 10th day of September, 2020.

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Abayomi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Sep 10, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-624 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Thomas v. Abayomi

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE JAVON THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. SAM ABAYOMI, ET AL, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Sep 10, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-624 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 10, 2020)