From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas Petroleum, LLC v. Lloyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 14, 2012
Case No. 1:11 -CV-00902-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11 -CV-00902-LJO-JLT

02-14-2012

THOMAS PETROLEUM, LLC d/b/a EASTERN SIERRA OIL, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH LLOYD, an individual, E.S. OIL, LLC, a California limited liability company, and DOES 1-30, inclusive, Defendant. KENNETH LLOYD, Cross-Complainant, v. THOMAS PETROLEUM, LLC, Cross-Defendant.

DONNA M. RUTTER (SBN 145704) MANI SHEIK (SBN 245487) CURIALE HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff THOMAS PETROLEUM, LLC d/b/a EASTERN SIERRA OIL


DONNA M. RUTTER (SBN 145704)

MANI SHEIK (SBN 245487)

CURIALE HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

THOMAS PETROLEUM, LLC d/b/a EASTERN

SIERRA OIL

PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO VACATE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER

Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Thomas Petroleum, LLC hereby moves this Court for an order to vacate the settlement conference currently set for February 27, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.

Plaintiff's counsel informed counsel for Defendant and Cross-Complainant Kenneth Lloyd and Defendant E.S. Oil, LLC ("Defendants") of Plaintiff's intent to move to vacate the settlement conference, and Defendants' counsel stated that he did not oppose the motion. (Declaration of Mani Sheik in Support of Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference, ¶ 4.)

Good cause exists for granting Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference.

The parties were engaged in private settlement discussions from August 2011 to January 2012. (Id. at ¶ 2.) The parties had stipulated to place the case on hold during their settlement talks, including placing a stay on all discovery. (Id.) On January 26, 2012, the parties ended their settlement talks without reaching an agreement. (Id. at ¶ 3.) With the case returning to litigation, the parties jointly agreed to lift the stay that had been in effect during their settlement talks. (Id.)

At this time, Plaintiff believes that the case is not in a posture conducive to settlement and that a settlement conference would not have a likelihood of success. Accordingly, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court vacate the settlement conference currently scheduled for February 27, 2012, at 10 a.m. Plaintiff will continue to evaluate the case and, if Plaintiff determines that the case has reached a settlement posture and that a settlement conference is likely to succeed, will request that the Court schedule a new conference at that time.

CURIALE HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP

By: __________

Donna M. Rutter

Mani Sheik

Attorneys for Plaintiff

THOMAS PETROLEUM, LLC d/b/a EASTERN

SIERRA OIL

ORDER

Good cause appearing, this Court VACATES the settlement conference currently set on February 27, 2012. If, in the future, counsel agree that the matter is in a settlement posture, they may file a joint request that the Court set a settlement conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas Petroleum, LLC v. Lloyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 14, 2012
Case No. 1:11 -CV-00902-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Thomas Petroleum, LLC v. Lloyd

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS PETROLEUM, LLC d/b/a EASTERN SIERRA OIL, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:11 -CV-00902-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2012)