Opinion
No. 3D19-0013
05-01-2019
THOMAS MACHINERY, INC., Petitioner, v. AINSWORTH INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Respondent.
Zebersky Payne Shaw Lewenz, LLP, and Jordan A. Shaw and Kimberly A. Slaven (Fort Lauderdale), for petitioner. Joseph E. Altschul, LLC, and Joseph E. Altschul and Alexandria L. Beaton (Pembroke Pines), for respondent.
Zebersky Payne Shaw Lewenz, LLP, and Jordan A. Shaw and Kimberly A. Slaven (Fort Lauderdale), for petitioner.
Joseph E. Altschul, LLC, and Joseph E. Altschul and Alexandria L. Beaton (Pembroke Pines), for respondent.
Before LOGUE, SCALES and HENDON, JJ.
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, defendant below, Thomas Machinery, Inc., seeks certiorari review of a non-final order of the trial court denying Petitioner's motion for leave to file an amended answer and affirmative defenses. We grant Respondent's motion to dismiss the petition because we lack certiorari jurisdiction to review the subject order; any error in denying Petitioner's leave to amend its pleadings is reviewable on plenary appeal. Harry Pepper & Assocs., Inc. v. City of Cape Coral, 369 So.2d 969, 970 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
Petition dismissed.