From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas-El v. Smith

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 15, 2021
Civil Action 20-CV-10128 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 15, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 20-CV-10128

07-15-2021

ROMERO MONTE THOMAS-EL, #684159, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS SMITH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter is presently before the Court on defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF. No. 46). Magistrate Judge David R. Grand has issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in which he recommends that this motion be denied. No party has objected to the R&R, and the objection period has expired.

The Court has reviewed defendants' motion, plaintiff's response, defendants' reply, and plaintiff's sur-reply, and agrees with the magistrate judge's analysis and recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Grand's R&R is hereby accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court [ECF No. 100].

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied [ECF No. 46]


Summaries of

Thomas-El v. Smith

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 15, 2021
Civil Action 20-CV-10128 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Thomas-El v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:ROMERO MONTE THOMAS-EL, #684159, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS SMITH, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 15, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 20-CV-10128 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 15, 2021)