From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas-Bey v. Stine

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jul 21, 2023
1:23CV35 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 21, 2023)

Opinion

1:23CV35

07-21-2023

ALPHONZA L.P. THOMAS-BEY, Petitioner, v. JOSH STINE, Respondent.


ORDER

Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge

The Recommendation and Order of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on June 7, 2023, was served on the parties in this action. Petitioner objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. 17.)

The court has reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination, which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motions (Docs. 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11) are DENIED and that the Petition is DISMISSED for failure to apply to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for an order authorizing this district court to consider the current Petition as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244, and that there being neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.

A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Thomas-Bey v. Stine

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jul 21, 2023
1:23CV35 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Thomas-Bey v. Stine

Case Details

Full title:ALPHONZA L.P. THOMAS-BEY, Petitioner, v. JOSH STINE, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Jul 21, 2023

Citations

1:23CV35 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 21, 2023)