From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

THOM v. McADAM

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 17, 1993
626 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 1993)

Opinion

No. 81378.

September 30, 1993. Rehearing Denied November 17, 1993.

Marguerite H. Davis and Alan Harrison Brents, Katz, Kutter, Haigler, Alderman, Davis Marks, P.A., Tallahassee, and Terry S. Bienstock and Hector R. Rivera, Bienstock Clark, Miami, for petitioner.

Sam Daniels and Robert M. Sondak, Paul, Landy, Beiley Harper, P.A., Miami, for respondent.


We have for review McAdam v. Thom, 610 So.2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on express and direct conflict with Waite v. Waite, 618 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The opinion below is quashed, and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of Waite. The nonconflict issues will not be addressed at this time.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

THOM v. McADAM

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 17, 1993
626 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 1993)
Case details for

THOM v. McADAM

Case Details

Full title:JOHN C. THOM, III, ETC., PETITIONER, v. SYBIL McADAM, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 17, 1993

Citations

626 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 1993)