From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Think Prods., Inc. v. Acco Brands Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 19, 2021
No. 2021-1128 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 19, 2021)

Opinion

2021-1128

07-19-2021

THINK PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION, ACCO BRANDS USA, LLC, Defendants-Appellees

EDWIN DAVID SCHINDLER, Edwin D. Schindler, Patent Attorney, Huntington, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JOHN FRANCIS VODOPIA, John F. Vodopia, PC, Huntington, NY. MICHAEL R. WEINER, Marshall, Gerstein &Borun LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by THOMAS LEE DUSTON, JOHN J. LUCAS, SANDIP PATEL.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:18-cv-07506, Judge Andrea R. Wood.

EDWIN DAVID SCHINDLER, Edwin D. Schindler, Patent Attorney, Huntington, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JOHN FRANCIS VODOPIA, John F. Vodopia, PC, Huntington, NY.

MICHAEL R. WEINER, Marshall, Gerstein &Borun LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by THOMAS LEE DUSTON, JOHN J. LUCAS, SANDIP PATEL.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM.

NEWMAN, REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Think Prods., Inc. v. Acco Brands Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 19, 2021
No. 2021-1128 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Think Prods., Inc. v. Acco Brands Corp.

Case Details

Full title:THINK PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION, ACCO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 19, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-1128 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 19, 2021)