From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thigpen v. Francis

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg
Dec 21, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06CV1 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 21, 2006)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06CV1.

December 21, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AS TO PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT


On this day the above styled matter came before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert (Doc. No. 10), dated August 30, 2006, regarding the Petitioner's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 6), to which the petitioner did not object. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court conducted a de novo review of the above. As a result, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 10) should be, and is hereby, ORDERED adopted. Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit true copies of this Order to the petitioner and all counsel of record herein.


Summaries of

Thigpen v. Francis

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg
Dec 21, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06CV1 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 21, 2006)
Case details for

Thigpen v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK R. THIGPEN, Petitioner, v. JOYCE FRANCIS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg

Date published: Dec 21, 2006

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06CV1 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 21, 2006)