From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thibert v. Patterson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 6, 1996
907 P.2d 1139 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

94-3174; CA A86860

Argued and submitted September 20, 1995.

Affirmed December 13, 1995. Petition for review denied March 6, 1996 ( 322 Or. 645)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Columbia County, Gregory E. Milnes, Judge.

Robert A. Lucas argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Lucas and Associates.

No appearance for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Costs to respondent, not including attorney fees.


Appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion by not granting her a postponement of a show cause hearing and requiring her to proceed with the hearing without an attorney. Appellant also asserts that the show cause orders were improperly presented ex parte to the trial judge. Appellant's designation of the record includes the trial court file and a one-page excerpt of the transcript from the show cause hearing. Based on the record before us, we are unable to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion.

Affirmed. Costs to respondent, not including attorney fees.


Summaries of

Thibert v. Patterson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 6, 1996
907 P.2d 1139 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Thibert v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:Janice THIBERT, Appellant, v. Robert PATTERSON, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 6, 1996

Citations

907 P.2d 1139 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
907 P.2d 1139