From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thevis v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 5, 1971
440 F.2d 1350 (5th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 30142.

April 5, 1971.

Ferris S. Ritchey, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., Robert Eugene Smith, Towson, Md., for plaintiff-appellant.

J.M. Breckenridge, Earl McBee, Herbert Jenkins, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellees.

Before CLARK, Associate Justice, and GEWIN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

Associate Justice, United States Supreme Court, Retired, sitting by designation.


The appellant brought this declaratory judgment action seeking to have two ordinances of the City of Birmingham, Alabama, declared unconstitutional and enjoining their further enforcement. Ordinance No. 67-2 regulating obscenity, is attacked as being vague and a prior restraint, while No. 68-59 is said to be overbroad as well as violative of due process. No claim of irreparable injury is made and a specific finding that the appellees had not acted in bad faith was entered. The court upheld both ordinances but found that each had been unconstitutionally applied. It declared the previous conviction of appellant's employee under ordinance No. 67-2 null and void and his arrest and prosecution under a charge of doing business without a license invalid, directed the return to the appellant of certain seized publications and ordered the re-instatement of his business license on his bookstore, which had been previously revoked.

In view of the fact that neither irreparable injury nor bad faith prosecution is present in the case we do not believe that the rule laid down in Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479, 482-483, 85 S. Ct. 1116, 14 L.Ed.2d 22 (1965) is applicable. Indeed, this case is controlled by a series of cases recently announced by the Supreme Court (1971), Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L. Ed.2d 669, in which Mr. Justice Black wrote for the court. As he points out both irreparable injury and bad faith prosecution must be present before a state prosecution may be enjoined. See Dyson v. Stein, 401 U.S. 290, 91 S.Ct. 769, 27 L.E.2d 781; Byrne v. Karalexis, 401 U.S. 216, 91 S.Ct. 777, 27 L.Ed.2d 792; and Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82, 91 S.Ct. 674, 27 L.Ed.2d 701, which were handed down the same day and are directly in point. See also Jackson v. Dobbs, 442 F.2d 928 (5th Cir. 1971); Gordon v. Landrieu, 442 F.2d 926 (5th Cir. 1971); Gornto v. Thomas, et al., 439 F.2d 1406 (5th Cir. 1971).

We, therefore, vacate the judgment and remand the case with directions that it be dismissed.

Vacated and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Thevis v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 5, 1971
440 F.2d 1350 (5th Cir. 1971)
Case details for

Thevis v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:M.G. THEVIS, Trading as Paris Book Stall, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jamie…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 5, 1971

Citations

440 F.2d 1350 (5th Cir. 1971)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Wade

In Becker, however the plaintiffs attacked a state statute not on its face but only as applied to them.…

Thevis v. Seibels

The order of the district court dismissing Thevis' complaint is affirmed. Federal declaratory or injunctive…