From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Theus v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Jan 8, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-2117-P (W.D. La. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-2117-P

01-08-2013

TROY L. THEUS v. K. HARRIS, ET AL.


JUDGE WALTER


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY


JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, and noting the lack of written objections filed by Petitioner and determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, at Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 8 day of _________ 2013.

____________________

DONALD E. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Theus v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Jan 8, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-2117-P (W.D. La. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Theus v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:TROY L. THEUS v. K. HARRIS, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-2117-P (W.D. La. Jan. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

Eaton v. Sadler

Caldwell v. Taggart, 4 Pet. 190, 7 L.Ed. 828; Brooks v. Harrison, 2 Ala. 214; 36 Cyc. 769; 25 R. C. L. 825;…

Maddox v. Fuller

Code 1923, § 6827; Davis, Inc., v. Christopher, 219 Ala. 346, 122 So. 406. Where the contract itself shows…