From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thesier v.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 4, 2019
SC: 158043 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)

Opinion

SC: 158043

02-04-2019

THOMAS L. THESIER and JUDITH L. THESIER, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. T.B.S.K. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, B.S. & K., DIANE BARTON, ESTATE OF SOL SONENKLAR, as successor SOL SONENKLAR, individually and as a Partner of B.S. & K., and RODGER BARTON, Defendants, and ESTATE OF AUDREY KLEIN, as successor of AUDREY S. KLEIN, individually and as a Partner of B.S. & K., Defendant-Appellant.


Order

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices COA: 336398
Ingham CC: 11-000678-CR

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 4, 2019

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Thesier v.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 4, 2019
SC: 158043 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Thesier v.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS L. THESIER and JUDITH L. THESIER, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. T.B.S.K…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 4, 2019

Citations

SC: 158043 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)