From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Therrien v. William H. Bassett Company

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
May 19, 1977
362 N.E.2d 1202 (Mass. App. Ct. 1977)

Opinion

May 19, 1977.

John A. Derba, Jr., for the plaintiff.

Cortland A. Mathers for the defendant.


Nothing in the record indicates that it was within the scope of employment of one Pike, a night watchman-custodian, to furnish transportation to a customer who should leave his car for servicing at the garage operated by the defendant, the watchman's employer, about two hours before the garage should open for the day's business. The defendant's motions for directed verdicts were properly allowed. See Stewart v. Worcester Gas Light Co. 341 Mass. 425, 436-437 (1960). Nothing in Konick v. Berke, Moore Co. Inc. 355 Mass. 463, 468 (1969), or in Pridgen v. Boston Housing Authy. 364 Mass. 696, 714-715, n. 10 (1974), leads to a different result.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Therrien v. William H. Bassett Company

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
May 19, 1977
362 N.E.2d 1202 (Mass. App. Ct. 1977)
Case details for

Therrien v. William H. Bassett Company

Case Details

Full title:MARY J. THERRIEN, administratrix, vs. WILLIAM H. BASSETT COMPANY

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: May 19, 1977

Citations

362 N.E.2d 1202 (Mass. App. Ct. 1977)
5 Mass. App. Ct. 826