From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Theroux v. Marshalls of MA, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Apr 4, 2022
3:21-cv-00945-L-BLM (S.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00945-L-BLM

04-04-2022

VERN ROBERT THEROUX JR., Plaintiff, v. MARSHALLS OF MA, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

[ECF NO. 20]

Hon. M. James Lorenz, United States District Judge

Pending before the Court in this action alleging disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 51 et seq., is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Marshalls of MA, Inc. (“Marshalls”). Marshalls argues all claims asserted against it should be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of standing under Article III of the United States Constitution. Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, was to file an opposition, if any, no later than November 1, 2021. No. opposition has been filed to date. Marshalls' motion is therefore granted as unopposed. See Civ. Loc. Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c); Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995). All claims asserted against Defendant Marshalls of MA, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Theroux v. Marshalls of MA, Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Apr 4, 2022
3:21-cv-00945-L-BLM (S.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Theroux v. Marshalls of MA, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VERN ROBERT THEROUX JR., Plaintiff, v. MARSHALLS OF MA, INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Apr 4, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-00945-L-BLM (S.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2022)