From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Theriot v. Bates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 13, 2013
Case No. 13-12180 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 13-12180

2013-09-13

BRIAN THERIOT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WALTER BATES, et al., Defendant.


HON. TERRENCE G. BERG

HON. MARK A. RANDON


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 7)

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon's August 19, 2013 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 7), recommending that Plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma pauperis, appoint counsel and bring in third party plaintiff (Dkt. 2, 3 & 4) be denied, and that the Complaint be dismissed.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy" of the report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a "de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made." Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). No party filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired. The Court will, therefore, accept the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation of August 19, 2013, as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Randon's Report and Recommendation of August 19, 2013, (Dkt. 7) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motions proceed in forma pauperis, appoint counsel and bring in third party plaintiff (Dkts. 2, 3 &4) are DENIED, and that the Complaint be DISMISSED. Specifically, as recommended by Magistrate Judge Randon, Plaintiffs' constitutional claims are dismissed with prejudice, and any remaining state law claims are dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

_________________

TERRENCE G. BERG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on September 13, 2013, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to all parties, and that copies were mailed to Plaintiffs, via U.S. Mail, to the addresses listed on the docket.

A. Chubb

Case Manager


Summaries of

Theriot v. Bates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 13, 2013
Case No. 13-12180 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Theriot v. Bates

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN THERIOT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WALTER BATES, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. 13-12180 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 13, 2013)