From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Theis Research, Inc. v. Brown & Bain

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 24, 2001
240 F.3d 795 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

No. 00-15219.

Submitted January 10, 2001.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed January 24, 2001.

Paul R. Johnson, Filice Brown Eassa McLeod LLP, Oakland, California, for the appellant.

Paul A. Renne, Cooley Godward LLP, San Francisco, California, for the appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-20645-RMW.

Before: TROTT, THOMAS and BERZON, Circuit Judges.



Theis Research, Inc. ("TRI"), appeals the district court's (1) grant of defendant Brown Bain's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and (2) dismissal without prejudice, on venue grounds, of TRI's motion to vacate an arbitration award.

The district court's dismissal without prejudice of TRI's motion to vacate was properly based on Sunshine Beauty Supplies, Inc. v. United States District Court, 872 F.2d 310, 312 (9th Cir. 1989), which held that venue dictated by 9 U.S.C. § 10 was mandatory. Applying Sunshine Beauty Supplies to this case would have required the motion to vacate to be heard in the District of Columbia, where the arbitration occurred.

However, while this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court held that the venue provisions of 9 U.S.C. § 10 are permissive, not mandatory. Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Constr. Co., 529 U.S. 193, 195, 120 S.Ct. 1331, 1334, 146 L.Ed.2d 171 (2000). Thus, venue in the Northern District of California may have been proper. Accordingly, we must vacate the district court's order and remand for reconsideration in light of Cortez Byrd Chips.

We vacate as premature the district court's order granting Brown Bain's motion to dismiss. The validity of the arbitration award must be determined prior to assessing whether the award precludes TRI's current claims. Further, TRI's assertions that the arbitration award was invalid because it was based on an illegal contract are properly resolved in the context of TRI's motion to vacate the award. We express no opinion on the merits of these issues.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Theis Research, Inc. v. Brown & Bain

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 24, 2001
240 F.3d 795 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

Theis Research, Inc. v. Brown & Bain

Case Details

Full title:THEIS RESEARCH, INC., (TRI), an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 24, 2001

Citations

240 F.3d 795 (9th Cir. 2001)

Citing Cases

In re Betta Products, Inc.

Because the contract involved commerce, the Federal Arbitration Act applies notwithstanding reference in the…