Opinion
Argued May 16, 1911
Decided May 30, 1911
Edmund J. Wager for appellant.
John D. McMahon for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
The Wire and Telephone Company of Am. v. Waterbury Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 30, 1911
96 N.E. 1121 (N.Y. 1911)
Summaries of
The Wire and Telephone Company of Am. v. Waterbury Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 30, 1911
96 N.E. 1121 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for
The Wire and Telephone Company of Am. v. Waterbury Co.
Case Details
Full title:THE WIRE AND TELEPHONE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Respondent, v . WATERBURY…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 30, 1911
Citations
96 N.E. 1121 (N.Y. 1911)
202 N.Y. 576