From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Vill. Recorder v. Video Vill. Studios DTLA

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 26, 2024
2:24-cv-01869-RGK-MAAx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-01869-RGK-MAAx

06-26-2024

THE VILLAGE RECORDER, Plaintiff(s), v. VIDEO VILLAGE STUDIOS DTLA, et al. Defendant(s).


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 14, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution [11] (“OSC”), which ordered plaintiff to file proof of timely service of the summons and complaint on all defendants. To date, no response to the OSC has been filed. The Court finds no good cause for the delay in service and Plaintiff's failure to respond. The case dismissed for lack of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

The Vill. Recorder v. Video Vill. Studios DTLA

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 26, 2024
2:24-cv-01869-RGK-MAAx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2024)
Case details for

The Vill. Recorder v. Video Vill. Studios DTLA

Case Details

Full title:THE VILLAGE RECORDER, Plaintiff(s), v. VIDEO VILLAGE STUDIOS DTLA, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 26, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-01869-RGK-MAAx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2024)