From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The State of Ohio v. Tannyhill

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 5, 1956
135 N.E.2d 765 (Ohio 1956)

Opinion

No. 34837

Decided July 5, 1956.

Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — First degree murder — Refusal to grant change of venue — Evidence — Confession — Admissibility — Photographs — State's witnesses in courtroom during argument — Instructions as to parole — Section 10, Article I, Constitution — Articles V and VI, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Sandusky County.

Mr. Thomas F. Dewey, prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

Mr. Henry G. Stahl, for appellant.


It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

The State of Ohio v. Tannyhill

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 5, 1956
135 N.E.2d 765 (Ohio 1956)
Case details for

The State of Ohio v. Tannyhill

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE v. TANNYHILL, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jul 5, 1956

Citations

135 N.E.2d 765 (Ohio 1956)
135 N.E.2d 765

Citing Cases

State v. Procter

"A change of venue rests largely in the discretion of the trial court, and there are numerous cases holding…

State v. Fairbanks

A change of venue rests largely in the discretion of the trial court, and there are numerous cases holding…