From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The State of Ohio v. Ross

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 24, 1954
119 N.E.2d 618 (Ohio 1954)

Opinion

No. 33909

Decided March 24, 1954.

Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Indictment for rape of female under 16 years of age — Section 12414, General Code — Conviction of "attempt to commit rape" — Accused ordered to Lima State Hospital for 60-day period — Section 13451-20, General Code — Accused's right to appeal from order — Constitutionality of Section 13451-20, General Code, questioned — Trial for crimes — Section 10, Article 1, Constitution — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Paulding county.

Mr. Harvey E. Hyman, prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

Mr. George A. Meekison and Mr. Otto W. Hess, for appellant.


It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

The State of Ohio v. Ross

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 24, 1954
119 N.E.2d 618 (Ohio 1954)
Case details for

The State of Ohio v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE v. ROSS, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 24, 1954

Citations

119 N.E.2d 618 (Ohio 1954)
119 N.E.2d 618

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Schildhaus v. Warden

In that State, where the defendant has been found guilty of specified crimes of serious import, it is…