Opinion
No. 36918
Decided March 29, 1961.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Bribery — Evidence — Fair trial — Claimed misconduct of juror — Sentence — Conditions of probation and suspension — Claimed cruel and unusual punishments — Due process — Section 10, Article I, Constitution — Articles V, VI and VIII, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Tuscarawas County.
Mr. Harlan R. Spies, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. James S. Patrick, for appellee.
Mr. Ian Bruce Hart, Sr., for appellant.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, BELL and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.
HERBERT, J., not participating.