Opinion
No. 33914
Decided June 16, 1954.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Acting in a way tending to cause delinquency of minor — Indecent exposure of person — Section 1639-45, General Code — Constitutionality of statute questioned — Claimed to be vague and indefinite — Not uniform in operation — Uniform operation of laws — Section 26, Article II, Constitution — Investiture of Legislative power — Section 1, Article II, Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery county.
Mr. Mathias H. Heck, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Walter A. Porter, for appellee.
Mr. Clarence J. Stewart, for appellant.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.