From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The State ex Rel., Kay v. Lausche, Governor

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 10, 1954
118 N.E.2d 414 (Ohio 1954)

Opinion

No. 33774

Decided March 10, 1954.

Elections — State Senator and Representatives — Special election to fill vacancies — Time fixed by Governor discretionary — Exercise of discretion not subject to judicial control — Mandamus.

IN MANDAMUS.

By this proceeding in mandamus relator seeks a writ requiring the Governor to call a special election in Cuyahoga county to fill vacancies in the offices of state Senator and state Representative for that county, as required by Section 3521.03, Revised Code.

Respondent in his answer alleges that he has fully performed the mandatory duty imposed by the statute by directing that a special election be held on the regular election day, November 2, 1954, to fill such vacancies, and by fixing the day of the primary election for such special election as May 4, 1954.

Relator alleges in his reply that the answer does not state a good defense.

The cause is now before the court on respondent's motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Mr. Richard B. Kay, in propria persona. Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, and Mr. Robert E. Leach, for respondent.


The respondent has performed his mandatory duty by ordering that a special election be held and by setting a time therefor. The time for holding such election is discretionary with the Governor, and that discretion is not subject to judicial control in the absence of an abuse thereof. State, ex rel. Armstrong, v. Davey, Governor, 130 Ohio St. 160, 198 N.E. 180.

The motion for judgment is allowed and a writ is denied.

Writ denied.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

The State ex Rel., Kay v. Lausche, Governor

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 10, 1954
118 N.E.2d 414 (Ohio 1954)
Case details for

The State ex Rel., Kay v. Lausche, Governor

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. KAY v. LAUSCHE, GOVERNOR

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 10, 1954

Citations

118 N.E.2d 414 (Ohio 1954)
118 N.E.2d 414

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. v. Hoermle

In the instant case, unlike in those cases, a time limitation has not even been specified but must be…

State ex Rel. v. Young

The provisions of Section 145.32, Revised Code, relative to voluntary and compulsory retirement, clearly and…