From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Scott Fetzer Company v. Gehring

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 19, 2003
Civil Action No. 02-cv-02917 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2003)

Summary

stating that the elements for these three claims are identical except that the federal claims require an effect on interstate commerce

Summary of this case from First American Marketing Corporation v. Canella

Opinion

Civil Action No. 02-cv-02917

September 19, 2003


ORDER


NOW, this 19th day of September, 2003, upon consideration of Plaintiff Scott Fetzer's Statement in Support of an Order Awarding to Plaintiff Attorney Fees and Costs filed July 31, 2003, which statement is uncontested; upon consideration of Plaintiff Scott Fetzer's Motion for Summary Judgment, Default, and Rule 37 Sanctions, which motion was filed June 6, 2003, which motion is unopposed; upon consideration of Plaintiff Scott Fetzer's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, Default, and Rule 37 Sanctions, which accompanied plaintiff's motion; upon consideration of the Appendix of Exhibits in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, Default, and Rule 37 Sanctions, which accompanied the motion; upon consideration of the Affidavit of Robert G. Shumay and Exhibits A through I in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, Default, and Rule 37 Sanctions, which accompanied the motion; upon consideration of the Declaration of Arthur F. Tredinnick and Exhibits A through L in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, Default, and Rule 37 Sanctions, which accompanied plaintiff's motion; and after oral argument held June 27, 2003,

IT IS ORDERED that judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff on Count I of the Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff on Count II of the Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff on Count III of the Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff on Count IV of the Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff on Count V of the Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $50,000.00.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is awarded costs in the amount of $5,280.03.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court may close the within civil action for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

The Scott Fetzer Company v. Gehring

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 19, 2003
Civil Action No. 02-cv-02917 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2003)

stating that the elements for these three claims are identical except that the federal claims require an effect on interstate commerce

Summary of this case from First American Marketing Corporation v. Canella
Case details for

The Scott Fetzer Company v. Gehring

Case Details

Full title:THE SCOTT FETZER COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. RAYMOND G. GEHRING, doing…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 19, 2003

Citations

Civil Action No. 02-cv-02917 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2003)

Citing Cases

Wentworth v. Settlement Funding LLC

The sole distinction between the federal and state analyses is that the federal claims require an effect on…

Valley Forge Military Acad. Found. v. Valley Forge Old Guard, Inc.

As Defendants acknowledge, these claims are governed by the same standards as their federal counterparts. See…