Opinion
3:22-CV-00375-ART-CSD
10-03-2022
THE R.J. ARMSTRONG LIVING TRUST, a Nevada testamentary entity, and DAVID C. ARMSTRONG, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. SUSAN HELEN ARMSTRONG HOLMES, an individual, Defendant. SUSAN HELEN ARMSTRONG HOLMES, an individual, Counterclaimant, v. THE R.J. ARMSTRONG LIVING TRUST, a Nevada testamentary entity, and DAVID C. ARMSTRONG, an individual, Counterdefendants.
BOYACK LAW GROUP Bradley S. Slighting, Esq. Representing Defendant/ Counterclaimant Susan Helen Armstrong Holmes STEPHENSON LAW, PLLC John Neil Stephenson Representing Plaintiffs The R.J. Armstrong Living Trust and David C. Armstrong
BOYACK LAW GROUP
Bradley S. Slighting, Esq.
Representing Defendant/ Counterclaimant
Susan Helen Armstrong Holmes
STEPHENSON LAW, PLLC
John Neil Stephenson
Representing Plaintiffs
The R.J. Armstrong Living Trust and David C. Armstrong
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO STRIKE/DISMISS
(SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION)
Anne R. Traum, U.S. District Court Judge
Defendant/Counterclaimant Susan Helen Armstrong Holmes (hereafter “Ms. Holmes,”) by and through her undersigned counsel, and plaintiffs/counterdefendants The R.J. Armstrong Living Trust and David C. Armstrong, (hereafter “Mr. Armstrong,”) by and through their undersigned counsel, respectfully filed the following '‘Stipulation To Extend Deadline To Respond to Motion to Strike/Dismiss,” (“Motion,”) by an addition ten (10) days. In the Motion, Mr. Armstrong's counsel believes that the Ms. Holmes' Answer and Counterclaim is defective and should be at minimum, amended. Upon review of the pending Motion, Ms. Holmes' new counsel concurs and now believes that a motion to amend her initial “Answer and Counterclaim” should be filed at the same time as a response to the Motion. Counsel for Ms. Holmes needs additional time to complete both tasks.
For this reason, good cause exits to extend the deadline to respond to the Motion by ten (10) days. If acceptable to the Court, the response to Mr. Armstrong's motion filed at Docket No. 6 will be due on October 10, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.