Opinion
2:23-cv-00428-CDS-BNW
07-05-2023
Marquis Aurbach Nick D. Crosby, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8996 Lance C. Earl, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 2695 W. Reese Levins, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15951 Attorneys for Plaintiff The Puliz Companies HUMPHREY O'ROURKE PLLC By: L. Edward Humphrey, Esq. NSB 9066 Patrick O'Rourke, Esq. NSB 13557 Attorneys for Defendants Kevin Annis and Kaya Stanley DAVID J. WINTERTON & ASSOCIATES, LTD. David J. Winterton, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 4142 Attorneys for Defendant Stephen Hoshimi
Marquis Aurbach
Nick D. Crosby, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8996
Lance C. Earl, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 2695
W. Reese Levins, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 15951
Attorneys for Plaintiff The Puliz Companies
HUMPHREY O'ROURKE PLLC
By: L. Edward Humphrey, Esq. NSB 9066
Patrick O'Rourke, Esq. NSB 13557
Attorneys for Defendants Kevin Annis and Kaya Stanley
DAVID J. WINTERTON & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
David J. Winterton, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 4142
Attorneys for Defendant Stephen Hoshimi
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO: (A) DEFENDANTS KEVIN ANNIS' AND KAYA STANLEY'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FEDERAL CLAIMS (BROUGHT UNDER SECTIONS 12(A)(1) AND 12(A)(2) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933) [ECF NO. 21]; AND (B) DEFENDANTS RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK, LLC AND STEPHEN HOSHIMI'S JOINDER TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS (SECOND REQUEST)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff, THE PULIZ COMPANIES, INC. (“Puliz”), Defendants, KEVIN ANNIS and KAYA STANLEY (collectively, the “Annis/Stanley Parties”), and Defendants, RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, and STEPHEN HOSHIMI, (collectively, the “Hoshimi Parties”) by and through their respective attorneys of record, that Plaintiff may have additional time to file its response to:
a. “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Federal Claims (Brought Under Sections 12(A)(1) and 12(A)(2) Of the Securities Act of 1933” [ECF NO. 21] (“Motion to Dismiss”) filed by Defendants, Kevin Annis and Kaya Stanley, and
b. “Joinder to the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Federal Claims (Brought Under Sections 12(A) And 12(A)(2) of the Securities Act of1933” [ECF 22] (“Joinder”)
Plaintiff shall have until July 14, 2023 to file its opposition to the Motion to Dismiss.
Counsel for Puliz, the Annis/Stanley Parties, and the Hoshimi Parties have been, and are engaged in discussions anticipated to resolve the dispute addressed in the Motion. However, with the upcoming July 4 Holiday and conflicting schedules, counsel have mutually agreed that additional time is required. Accordingly, this extension to July 14, 2023 is intended to permit the parties necessary additional time and opportunity to further confer in an effort to resolve the dispute addressed in the Motion to Dismiss and Joinder.
ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff shall have until July 14, 2023, to file its opposition to the Motion to Dismiss.