Opinion
No. 298 CA 21-01184
07-08-2022
DUKE, HOLZMAN, PHOTIADIS & GRESENS LLP, BUFFALO (ELIZABETH A. KRAENGEL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CONCEPT CONSTRUCTION CORP. RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (AARON W. KNIGHTS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT R.E. KRUG CORP. WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, BUFFALO (WILLIAM ELMER BRUECKNER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL F. PERLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS.
DUKE, HOLZMAN, PHOTIADIS & GRESENS LLP, BUFFALO (ELIZABETH A. KRAENGEL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CONCEPT CONSTRUCTION CORP.
RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (AARON W. KNIGHTS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT R.E. KRUG CORP.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, BUFFALO (WILLIAM ELMER BRUECKNER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL F. PERLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered August 5, 2021. The order granted the motion of defendants 1094 Group, LLC, and 10 Ellicott Square Court Corporation to dismiss the cross claims filed against them by defendants Concept Construction Corp. and R.E. Krug Corp.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in The Pasquale Condominium Bd. of Mgrs. v 1094 Group, LLC ([appeal No. 1] - A.D.3d - [] [4th Dept 2022]).