From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Oaks v. Paulk

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 26, 1990
557 So. 2d 219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1451.

February 26, 1990.

H. George Kagan and Wendy Ellen Marfino of Miller, Hodges, Kagan Chait, Deerfield Beach, for appellants.

Mark A. Massey of Daniel L. Hightower, P.A., Ocala, for appellee.


In this workers' compensation appeal the judge of compensation claims found claimant's accident to be compensable under the "special errand" exception to the going and coming rule. We affirm. See Spartan Food Systems Subsidiaries v. Hopkins, 525 So.2d 987 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); and Gulliford v. Nikko Gold Coast Cruises, 423 So.2d 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Moreover, based on the facts of this case as found by the judge, we affirm the judge's conclusion that the employer/carrier were estopped from asserting the statute of limitations defense. See McCort v. Southland Corporation, 543 So.2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (opinion clarified); Wood v. McTyre Trucking Co., Inc., 526 So.2d 739 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

However, appellants maintain and claimant agrees that the judge erred in awarding temporary total disability benefits retroactively during the period beginning January 1986 through mid-April 1986 when claimant was receiving her full wages. Accordingly, the cause is reversed and remanded on this point for further consideration of an appropriate offset of such benefits.

AFFIRMED, in part, REVERSED, in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings.

ERVIN and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

The Oaks v. Paulk

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 26, 1990
557 So. 2d 219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

The Oaks v. Paulk

Case Details

Full title:THE OAKS AND CIGNA PROPERTY CASUALTY, APPELLANTS, v. CATHY HUDSON PAULK…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 26, 1990

Citations

557 So. 2d 219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Charles J. Givens Org. v. Morris

Thus, the JCC erred in retroactively awarding TTD benefits for this period. See The Oaks v.Paulk, 557 So.2d…