From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

THE KING v. PHILIP HENRY RAPP

U.S.
Jan 1, 1764
1 U.S. 9 (1764)

Opinion

APRIL TERM, 1764.


INDICTMENT for Misdemeanor, in marrying a Man to a Woman who had another Husband living. — Moved, on the Part of the Defendant, to put off the Trial on Affidavit of material Witnesses wanting, and that he had taken the proper steps to get them. — Opposed by the Attorney General, as being a criminal Case, and not within the Rules of civil Cases. But granted BY THE COURT, the Defendant being a Clergyman, and his Living depending on his acquittal: but declared not to be a Precedent.

In Rex versus D'Eon 3. Burr 1713. The Court said that in all Cases, whether criminal, or civil, a Trial shall not be hurried on, to as to do injustice to the Defendant.


Summaries of

THE KING v. PHILIP HENRY RAPP

U.S.
Jan 1, 1764
1 U.S. 9 (1764)
Case details for

THE KING v. PHILIP HENRY RAPP

Case Details

Full title:THE KING versus PHILIP HENRY RAPP

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1764

Citations

1 U.S. 9 (1764)