From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Hartford Fire Ins. v. Jackson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 10, 2000
756 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D99-2750.

Opinion filed May 10, 2000.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Thomas S. Wilson, Jr., Judge, L.T. No. 99-2741.

George, Hartz, Lundeen and Fulmer and Charles M.P. George and Mitchell L. Lundeen, for appellant.

Scott A. Mager and Gary S. Gaffney (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellees.

Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and FLETCHER, JJ.


The sole issue presented to the trial court, and now presented to us for our consideration, is the question of whether the insurance policy as issued is ambiguous.

Contrary to the determination made by the trial court, we find no ambiguity presented by the "General Aggregate Limit" and "Each Occurrence Limit" when those provisions are read together in the context of the entire insurance policy as a whole.

Accordingly, the summary judgment entered in plaintiffs' favor, regarding the above provisions, is reversed, and this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

The Hartford Fire Ins. v. Jackson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 10, 2000
756 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

The Hartford Fire Ins. v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:THE HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. ESTHER JACKSON, etc.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 10, 2000

Citations

756 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)