From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Florida Bar v. Schilling

Supreme Court of Florida
May 5, 1986
486 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1986)

Summary

holding that neglect of responsibilities in two matters warranted six-month suspension

Summary of this case from Florida Bar v. Elster

Opinion

No. 67692.

February 27, 1986. Rehearing Denied May 5, 1986.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David M. Barnovitz, Bar Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for complainant.

No appearance, for respondent.


In this grievance procedure against Christopher J. Schilling, a member of The Florida Bar, the referee has recommended that we find Mr. Schilling guilty of violating Disciplinary Rule 6-101(A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The referee concluded that the respondent had neglected responsibilities in two matters he took for representation. In light of Schilling's past conduct he recommends a public reprimand, six-month suspension, and assessment of costs.

Fla. Bar Code Prof.Resp., D.R. 6-101(A)(3), provides:
(A) A lawyer shall not:
. . . .
(3) Neglect a legal matter entrusted to him.

We approve the report and the recommendation. Confidence in, and proper utilization of, the legal system is adversely affected when a lawyer fails to diligently pursue a legal matter entrusted to that lawyer's care. A failure to do so is a direct violation of the oath a lawyer takes upon his admission to the bar. Christopher J. Schilling is hereby publicly reprimanded for his failure to fulfill his lawyer obligations. His suspension will be effective thirty days from the date this opinion is filed. Judgment for costs in the amount of $680.23 is hereby entered against Schilling, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and McDONALD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

The Florida Bar v. Schilling

Supreme Court of Florida
May 5, 1986
486 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1986)

holding that neglect of responsibilities in two matters warranted six-month suspension

Summary of this case from Florida Bar v. Elster

finding a six-month suspension was warranted for attorney who neglected his responsibilities, in light of past conduct

Summary of this case from Florida Bar v. Morrison

approving the referee's recommendation that the attorney be publicly reprimanded and suspended for six months because the attorney "had neglected responsibilities in two matters he took for representation," and in light of the attorney's "past conduct"

Summary of this case from Florida Bar v. Arango

approving referee's recommendation of public reprimand and six-month suspension for failure to diligently pursue a legal matter

Summary of this case from The Florida Bar v. Whitaker

imposing a six-month suspension for neglect of client matters

Summary of this case from The Florida Bar v. Shoureas
Case details for

The Florida Bar v. Schilling

Case Details

Full title:THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT, v. CHRISTOPHER J. SCHILLING, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 5, 1986

Citations

486 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1986)

Citing Cases

The Florida Bar v. Shoureas

yer Sanctions and has a reasonable basis in existing case law. See, e.g., Florida Bar v. Cimbler, 840 So.2d…

Florida Bar v. Morrison

The failure of an attorney to pursue representation on behalf of a client resulting in prejudice to a…