From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Florida Bar v. Hall

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 17, 1988
521 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 1988)

Opinion

No. 70951.

March 17, 1988.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David G. McGunegle, Bar Counsel, Orlando, for complainant.

James F. Hall, Flagler Beach, in pro. per.


This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court for consideration of a referee's report finding professional misconduct. The respondent, James F. Hall, does not challenge the report.

In the course of respondent's representation of the purchasers in a real estate transaction, a check was sent to respondent's office for the purpose of paying a deposit to the seller. The check was misplaced, but respondent failed to inform his clients of the fact, with the result that a contractual deadline expired and the transaction was cancelled. The check was never negotiated so the clients lost nothing except the benefit of the bargain. For neglecting a matter entrusted to him and for conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law, the referee recommends that respondent receive a public reprimand.

We approve the referee's report. We hereby reprimand attorney James F. Hall.

The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the respondent. Judgment is entered against James F. Hall for costs in the amount for $574.95.

It is so ordered.

McDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

The Florida Bar v. Hall

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 17, 1988
521 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 1988)
Case details for

The Florida Bar v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT, v. JAMES F. HALL, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 17, 1988

Citations

521 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 1988)