From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Florida Bar

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 18, 1991
580 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 1991)

Summary

holding that the Court would "not allow the practice of law in Florida of one disbarred in his home state"

Summary of this case from In re Amendments to Rules of the Sup. Court

Opinion

No. 75815.

April 25, 1991. Rehearing Denied June 18, 1991.

Sheldon J. Sanders, petitioner in pro. per.

James N. Watson, Jr., Bar Counsel, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, for respondent.


Sheldon J. Sanders, a suspended member of The Florida Bar residing in New York, seeks the termination of his suspension and reinstatement to The Florida Bar. This Court suspended Sanders after notification that he had been convicted of a felony in his home state of New York, for which he has been disbarred. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

A referee, appointed by this Court to take testimony and make recommendations, concluded that Sanders has a good character, has complied with the suspension, has rehabilitated himself, and has shown a sincere intent to avoid wrongdoing. The referee declined to make a recommendation of reinstatement, however, because Sanders has not been readmitted in his home state of New York, even though he has applied for readmission three times. Because the misconduct occurred in New York, the referee agreed with and grounded his conclusion to decline recommendation for reinstatement on Justice Ehrlich's special concurring opinion in The Florida Bar re Sickmen, 523 So.2d 154, 156 (Fla. 1988), where he said:

If New York had instituted its disciplinary proceedings first and had disbarred Mr. Sickmen, there is no doubt in my mind that this Court would have imposed the same discipline, and would not readmit him to The Florida Bar unless and until the State of New York had done likewise.

We conclude that this is a valid consideration. We should not allow the practice of law in Florida of one disbarred in his home state. We also note that the record fails to demonstrate that Sanders has had his civil rights restored, a condition we require. The Florida Bar v. Moody, 577 So.2d 1317 (Fla. 1991); The Florida Bar v. Clark, 359 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1978).

We therefore deny Sanders' petition for reinstatement to The Florida Bar. Judgment for costs of $841.25 is hereby entered against Sanders, for which sum let execution issue. See R. Regulating Fla. Bar 3-7.9(d), (n)(4).

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

The Petition for Rehearing is denied. However, having satisfied this Court that his civil rights have been restored, Sheldon J. Sanders shall be admitted to The Florida Bar without further proceedings if he is readmitted to practice in his home state of New York within twelve (12) months.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

The Florida Bar

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 18, 1991
580 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 1991)

holding that the Court would "not allow the practice of law in Florida of one disbarred in his home state"

Summary of this case from In re Amendments to Rules of the Sup. Court

denying reinstatement to The Florida Bar of attorney disbarred in his home state of New York who had not gained readmission to the Bar in that state

Summary of this case from The Florida Bar re Untracht
Case details for

The Florida Bar

Case Details

Full title:THE FLORIDA BAR RE: SHELDON J. SANDERS

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 18, 1991

Citations

580 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 1991)

Citing Cases

Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Webster, SC08-296

We should not allow the practice of law in Florida by one disbarred in a foreign state. See, e.g., Fla. Bar…

Florida Bd. of Bar Exam. Re: Webster

We should not allow the practice of law in Florida by one disbarred in a foreign state. See, e.g., Fla. Bar…