Opinion
2:20-cv-01381-KJD-VCF
08-30-2023
THE ESTATE OF PAUL LEWIS BROWNING; EXREL, BETTY BROWNING, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF PAUL LEWIS BROWNING, Plaintiffs, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; LT. GREG JOLLEY; LT. JOHN CONNER; SGT. F. JERGOVIC; SGT. C. ALBERT; DETECTIVE SGT. MICHAEL BUNKER, #653; DETECTIVE SGT. T. ROSEN; DETECTIVE ROBERT LEONARD, P#471; DETECTIVE H. OREN; DETECTIVE BERT LEVOS, #144; DETECTIVE THORTON; OFFICER GREGORY BRANON, P#2187; OFFICER GARY CALDWELL, P#2301; OFFICER DAVID RADCLIFF, P#2191; OFFICER R. ROBERTSON, P#120; and IDENTIFICATION SPECIALIST DAVID R. HORN, #C1928, Defendants.
Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants LVMPD, Lt. Jolley, Det. Bunker, Det. Leonard, Ofc. Branon, Ofc. Radcliff, and Horn LOEVY & LOEVY Elizabeth Wang, Esq.* Admitted pro hac vice David B. Owens, Esq. Loevy & Loevy c/o Civil Rights and Justice Clinic University of Washington Law School William H. Gates Hall, Suite 265 Attorney for Plaintiffs * Admitted pro hac vice
Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants LVMPD, Lt. Jolley, Det. Bunker, Det. Leonard, Ofc. Branon, Ofc. Radcliff, and Horn
LOEVY & LOEVY Elizabeth Wang, Esq.* Admitted pro hac vice David B. Owens, Esq. Loevy & Loevy c/o Civil Rights and Justice Clinic University of Washington Law School William H. Gates Hall, Suite 265 Attorney for Plaintiffs * Admitted pro hac vice
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 92) (SECOND REQUEST)
Plaintiffs, by and through their attorney of record, David B. Owens, Esq. and Elizabeth Wang, Esq. of Loevy & Loevy, and Defendants, by and through their attorney of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. of Marquis Aurbach, hereby agree to jointly stipulate to the following:
1. On June 16, 2023, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 81)
2. On August 3, 2023, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 91)
3. On August 9, 2023, Plaintiffs filed a Corrected Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 92)
4. On August 28, 2023, this Court granted Defendants' stipulation to extend deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment from August 17, 2023 to August 31, 2023. (ECF No. 96)
5. The parties have stipulated and agreed to extend the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment from August 31, 2023 to September 6, 2023.
6. This Stipulation is brought in good faith.
a. Plaintiff's Opposition is 72-pages and contains numerous legal arguments requiring a response.
b. Unexpectedly, defense counsel received a notice for the Ninth Circuit to supplement a pending appeal scheduled for oral argument with a two-week deadline.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED the deadline for Defendants to file their Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from August 31, 2023 to September 6, 2023.