From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The City of Watertown v. Fairbanks

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1875
65 N.Y. 588 (N.Y. 1875)

Opinion

Submitted September 29, 1874

Decided May term, 1875

D. O'Brien for the appellant.

M.H. Merwin for the respondent.


LOTT, Ch. C., reads for reversal; GRAY and DWIGHT, CC., concur in result on ground that section 38 of the amendatory act of 1871, so far as it relates to the confirmation of assessments, is void, being in contravention of section 16, article 3, of the State Constitution.

EARL, C., reads for affirmance; REYNOLDS, C., concurs

Judgment reversed and new trial granted.


Summaries of

The City of Watertown v. Fairbanks

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1875
65 N.Y. 588 (N.Y. 1875)
Case details for

The City of Watertown v. Fairbanks

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF WATERTOWN, Respondent, v . JASON FAIRBANKS, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 1, 1875

Citations

65 N.Y. 588 (N.Y. 1875)

Citing Cases

Parker v. Wallace

The power to levy an assessment for a local improvement exists only where it is clearly and distinctly…

Matter of Astwood v. Cohen

Our Legislature has consistently styled such an independent addition to a city charter as "An Act to amend"…